Once upon a time I took an aptitude test. It was part of a course for unemployed people. I was hoping it would give me some pointers to what I really should be doing with my life, and how I could be more successful.
It wasn’t one of those tests where you have to choose between pairs of activities. I hate those. And it wasn’t one where you rate yourself on various characteristics. Don’t like those either. It was a problem-solving test with sections of different kinds of problems. That was ok. I like solving problems.
I can’t remember much about most of the sections. Probably some verbal tests, maybe some logical puzzles, possibly diagrams of cogs and wheels and pulleys. I do remember the maths test because it was the hardest. I hadn’t done any maths for a long time. But my brain cogs managed to de-rust themselves enough to answer the questions.
And I remember the abstract reasoning test. It was the last one and I loved it. Zipped through it in no time and wished there was more. I might have been the only one who enjoyed it though. I could see other people sitting there looking perplexed. And when I handed it to the supervisor he looked at me as if he didn’t believe I could have done it so fast, and maybe I’d just ticked the answers at random so I could go home early.
The results were kind of disappointing. I was very good at everything. So there were no clues about what I was doing wrong or what my true vocation in life should be. No excuses for being a failure - it must be all my own fault. Because high aptitudes are obviously good things to have, aren’t they? How could they be a problem?
Well Hank Pfeffer thinks they can be a problem. He’s even written an article called The Too Many Aptitudes Problem. Read it and see if you think he’s describing Scanners and Renaissance Souls.
Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website